Search This Blog

Thursday, 29 November 2018

Friends of Israel banned from speaking at Northern Ireland council event


Disappointed: Steven Jaffe1
Disappointed: Steven Jaffe
The head of a pro-Israeli group says the decision to ban the Northern Ireland Friends of Israel from speaking at an event in Londonderry is "hugely disappointing".
Steven Jaffe, co-chair of the organisation that aims to build bridges between Northern Ireland and Israel, was speaking after an invitation to address Derry City and Strabane District Council was voted down.
At a meeting in the city's Guildhall, independent republican councillor Paul Gallagher proposed sending 'a message of solidarity' out to coincide with the United Nations' Day of Solidarity with the people of Palestine, on November 29.
The proposal passed despite opposition from all unionists present.
Ulster Unionist deputy mayor Derek Hussey proposed that the council invite the NI Friends of Israel to address members, on the basis that "there are two sides to every story".
However Sinn Fein councillor Christopher Jackson said his party could not support the proposal, given that the "Israeli onslaught on the Palestinian people continues to this day".
While unionist councillors supported the proposal, it failed after remaining SDLP, Sinn Fein and Independents opposed it
Mr Jaffe said: "This is not just excluding us as an organisation but a wider section of the community that regards itself as being Friends of Israel.
"The council is effectively saying that people who hold that view are not welcome, which is of great concern. We addressed Fermanagh and Omagh District Council this month where there were members of all political parties present. Everyone listened respectfully and, while we didn't all agree, it was an evening of dialogue. Sadly, it doesn't appear that will be possible at Derry City and Strabane Council level. It's more than a little ironic that this happened in Derry given its history of civil rights and inclusivity. I wonder if John Hume was a well man what he'd say about it."

Wednesday, 28 November 2018

Prime Minister Theresa speech at antisemitism reception: 26 November 2018


Prime Minister Theresa May with guests at reception in Downing Street





Prime Minister Theresa May spoke at a reception in Downing Street on antisemitism and misogyny.

Good evening everyone and welcome to Downing Street. As always at events like this it’s a real pleasure to share this remarkable house with some truly remarkable people. But I confess that, tonight, my emotions are somewhat mixed.
Throughout 2018, I’ve had the privilege of taking in part in many celebrations of women and women’s rights.
Events marking the centenary of British women winning the vote. The unveiling of the Millicent Fawcett statue. An unprecedented gathering of women MPs from around the world.
But the joy of those occasions has been tempered by the resurgence of two age-old hatreds that many had dared to hope were becoming a thing of the past.
2018 was the year in which Claire Kober, who is here today, stepped down as a council leader after facing a torrent of personal abuse in which, as she said, “the only thing worse than the sexism was the antisemitism”.
It was the year in which journalist Karen Glaser felt compelled to write that “When my … mother came to Britain in the Sixties she stopped feeling scared of being Jewish. But now, 50 years later, she was feeling frightened again.”
And it was the year in which Parliament heard women MPs, many of whom are here today, describing the deluge of vile misogynistic and antisemitic threats they receive on a near-daily basis.
The research published at today’s conference, showing that Jewish women politicians are more likely to attract the attentions of far-Right hate groups, was deeply disturbing. But I doubt it came as much of a surprise to those who have been on the receiving end.
In both data and anecdote, the evidence is clear: in 2018, in the United Kingdom, Jewish women are increasingly coming under dual attack. Abused for being women and abused for being Jewish.
These attitudes are not limited to the far Right. As is so often the case with antisemitism, bigotry directed at Jewish women also comes from those who would never consider themselves to be racist, including within the women’s rights movement itself.
Some Jewish women have been told that they’re not “real” feminists unless they publically disavow Israel’s right to exist, or been thrown off pride marches for flying rainbow flags that feature the Star of David. And as one British Jew put it earlier this year, “Going on a … women’s rights march can be a tricky affair when you find yourself marching alongside people carrying banners merging the Israeli flag with a swastika”.
This kind of double-standard is often justified by the old canard that antisemitism isn’t really racism, as racism can only “punch down” and Jews are universally wealthy and powerful – an argument that is, in itself, deeply antisemitic.
I have no time for equivocation. Antisemitism is racism – and any “equality” movement that indulges or ignores it is not worthy of the name.
Because hatred and discrimination must be tackled wherever and however it rears its head. And I’m proud to lead a government that is doing so.
We’re making sure courts have powers they need to deal with those who peddle hatred, asking the Law Commission to undertake a full review of hate crime legislation.
We’re working to stem the rising tide of online bigotry, establishing a new Annual Internet Safety Transparency Report. The report will provide comprehensive data on what offensive content is being reported, what is being removed, and how social media companies are responding to complaints.
We’re standing up for women’s rights at home and abroad– forcing companies to reveal their gender pay gaps, cracking down on modern slavery, backing the Women’s Business Council and more.
We’re removing all hiding places for antisemitism, becoming the first government in the world to adopt the IHRA’s working definition – and all its examples.
And we’re protecting Jewish people from the kind of violent attacks their community has experienced in the United States and Europe, which is why we continue to provide more than £13 million of funding to the Community Security Trust each year.
But tackling the visible symptoms of hatred is only half the battle. To eradicate a noxious weed you must also remove its root, which is why we are also committed to educating people about where bigotry can lead.
Standing in the heart of our democracy on a site right next to Parliament, the National Holocaust Memorial will be accompanied by an education centre that will lead a national effort to fight hatred and prejudice in all its forms. As the Chancellor announced in last month’s Budget, we will also provide £1.7 million for school programmes marking the 75th anniversary of the liberation of Bergen-Belsen.
And we are continuing to support the Holocaust Educational Trust, not just backing its Lessons From Auschwitz programme but extending it to cover universities. The first students and university leaders to take part in the new scheme travelled to Poland just last week.
The HET is just one of many bodies working hard to tackle the kind of prejudices you discussed at today’s conference.
John Mann and the APPG on antisemitism have also done so much not just to highlight the scale of the problem but also to explore solutions, particularly with their work around online abuse – so thank you, John, for all your work.
I’d also like to thank Sir Trevor Pears and everyone at the Antisemitism Policy Trust, who made today’s world-first conference happen… And the three women who chaired it: Luciana Berger, Theresa Villiers, and Dr Lisa Cameron – a trio that demonstrates how this is an issue that truly transcends party lines.
But most of all, I’d like to thank each and every one of you.
As Claire Kober said when she was bombarded with abuse, “to be tolerant is to be complicit”.
So thank you for refusing to tolerate antisemitism and misogyny in any form.
Thank you for refusing to be complicit and look the other way when confronted with bigotry of any kind.
And thank you for lending your voices to the growing chorus that will drown out the sound and fury of the racists and the sexists.
Freedom of thought and freedom of speech have never meant freedom to abuse and freedom to threaten.
Antisemitism and misogyny have no place in this country.
Hatred can be defeated.
Hatred must be defeated.
And, when I look around this room and see so many brave, dedicated men and women, I know that hatred will be defeated.
Published 27 November 2018
https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-speech-at-antisemitism-reception-26-november-2018

Airbnb Singles Out Jews In Racially Targeted Ban On West Bank Rentals

Nonetheless, Americans should not tolerate double standards, discrimination or blatant racism against any group of people.



Daniel Pomerantz
By 
It’s absolutely stunning to see a boycott against Jews by an American company in the year 2018. Yet that’s exactly what Airbnb is doing. On Nov. 19, 2018, Airbnb, Inc. (the popular online hospitality service) announced, “We concluded that we should remove listings in Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank that are at the core of the dispute between Israelis and Palestinians.”
The policy is even more devious than it sounds. In short, Israeli Jews living in Judea/Samaria (the “West Bank”) may no longer rent out their homes and apartments via the Airbnb platform. Muslims, Christians, and citizens of the Palestinian Authority are free to continue doing so: the boycott targets only Jews. At present, Airbnb does not boycott any other country nor target any other dispute.
The announcement has sparked public discussion about whether the decision is discriminatory or even antisemitic. Yet Western media coverage has widely neglected one critical fact: Boycotting Israel is not “free speech.” It might even be illegal.
To be clear, no private citizen is obligated to buy products from any particular foreign nation. That is a personal choice. Also, anyone may lobby the U.S. government to institute a boycott at a national level — that is free speech.
Article I Section 8 of the Constitution contains the “Commerce Clause” which gives Congress the power to “regulate Commerce with foreign Nations.” This means that a private boycott against a foreign government is not “free speech” like the domestic boycotts of the civil rights Movement. Rather, it is a tool of statecraft that, like war, is reserved to the federal government alone.
One of the earliest applications of the Commerce Clause was the Sherman Act of 1890, which implements the federal government’s power to regulate activities related to commerce and to prevent “restraint of trade.” Years after the Sherman Act, the Supreme Court held that expressive activities that impinge on constitutional powers reserved to the government are not constitutionally protected “free speech.” (United States v. O’Brien). This legal tradition eventually led to the Export Administration Act of 1979.
Attempts to implement a wide ranging, private boycott against a foreign nation illegally bypass Congress’s exclusive power to regulate foreign trade. Airbnb is undermining the American democratic system and potentially violating the Constitution.
Airbnb’s actions go beyond economic effect. They can also be seen as a serious breach of media ethics. In this online age, companies don’t just sell products, they also communicate with their millions of customers through online platforms. When such a company communicates a political message, the customers hear it. When that message relates to a topic on which the company has credibility, many will believe it.
In this case, Airbnb has 15 million followers on Facebook, 670,000 on Twitter, and 590,000 on its own community forum. Airbnb also has a jaw-dropping 150 million users on its mobile app and website, and more people visit its web site every day than watch CNN, MSNBC, or BBC’s prime time news broadcasts on a typical evening.
Airbnb enjoys significant credibility on the question of travel, including safety, advisability, and in this case, possibly even morality. So when Airbnb announces on its various media platforms that boycotts against Israel are the key to Mideast peace, millions of people are listening.
America has so many anti-boycott laws that there is an entire federal department dedicated to enforcing them — the United States Office of Antiboycott 
Compliance (OAC). As Executive Director of HonestReporting, a media watchdog NGO, I filed a complaint on the following grounds: The acts enforced by the OAC prohibit agreements to refuse or actual refusal to do business with or in Israel or with blacklisted companies, and agreements to discriminate or actual discrimination against other persons based on race, religion, sex, national origin, or nationality.
As the Airbnb boycott applies only to Israel, and specifically to properties owned by Jews or Israeli citizens, but exempts Christians, Muslims, and citizens of the Palestinian Authority who live in the same area, it fits squarely within the prohibitions covered by the OAC.
If found to be in violation of the relevant laws, Airbnb could be subject to significant fines, tax consequences or even criminal action. Through its potentially illegal acts, the online platform is even risking its ability to continue doing business in the United States. A number of other Israeli and American organizations are taking actions under other state and federal laws, including local laws in 26 of America’s 50 states.
Legalities aside, Airbnb’s decision is an astonishing example of anachronistic racism rearing its ugly head in our modern world. In fairness, Airbnb may be acting merely on bad information rather than bad intentions. Its boycott is the result of numerous requests by the Palestinian Authority government and biased reports by several blatantly anti-Israel pressure groups, including the misleadingly named Human Rights Watch and Jewish Voice for Peace. Nonetheless, Americans should not tolerate double 
standards, discrimination or blatant racism 
against any group of people. We’re better than that. America is better than that.
Daniel Pomerantz is an attorney and the executive director for HonestReporting.com, a media monitoring NGO based in Jerusalem, the capital of Israel. Twitter: @danielspeaksup.
  













SNP expel blogger in 'anti-Semitism' row





A NATIONALIST blogger who was accused of “vile anti-Semitism” after citing Hitler in an attack on a Jewish Labour activist has been expelled by the SNP.
Gareth Wardell, who runs the Grouse Beater blog, has been excluded with immediate effect, although he has a right to appeal.
Mr Wardell called it a “clumsy authoritarian solution” that was “bereft of decency and dignity”, and said he was considering legal action against a number of people for defamation.
He also questioned why the SNP reacted "so ineptly and cowardly in assuming there was cause for concern?"







An SNP spokesman said: “The decision of the Member Conduct Committee has been reported to Mr Wardell.
“As he has a right to appeal, we’ll make no further comment until the process is complete."



The husband of the respected Scottish artist Barbara Rae, Mr Wardell was suspended by the SNP last month after a complaint to the party’s disciplinary committee.
It followed him writing an article describing the GMB union as a “Cockney clique”, in which he focused on GMB Scotland organiser Rhea Wolfson.
Ms Wolfson, a Jewish Labour activist who is her party’s Westminster candidate in Livingston, played a prominent part in the recent strike over equal pay at SNP-run Glasgow City Council.
In a section titled “Hitler’s view”, Mr Wardell wrote: “In Part 1 of Mein Kampf, Hitler attacks unions over and over again. Unions are fascism’s Public Enemy Number 1. He went further.
“He accused ‘The Jew’ of gradually assuming leadership of the trade union movement. Hitler wanted a blindly obedient fighting force loyal only to the national leader of government.
“Whether or not Wolfson is intellectually aware of Hitler’s outlook is unknown but she certainly knows how to make the most of it.”
Ms Wolfson, a past victim of anti-Semitic abuse, condemned the article.
Labour MSP Neil Findlay called it a “vile anti-Semitic blog” and attacked those who promoted it on social media, including Councillor Frank Anderson, SNP group leader in West Lothian.
Gareth Wardell
Gareth Wardell

The SNP said Ms Wolfson deserved “a full apology from the author for the clear offence that has been caused”.
Nicola Sturgeon was also dragged into the row, telling Holyrood that Mr Anderson made a “significant error of judgment” out of ignorance.

Mr Anderson also wrote an “unreserved apology” to Ms Wolfson.
Confirming his expulsion on Twitter, Mr Wardell said he was treated unfairly by the SNP.
He said: “The standard of intellect and guile of the disciplinary committee is lamentable.
“I gave the SNP £1,000 some time ago. I wonder if I should ask for it back?
“Knowing of my record for the cause they ought to have invited me to a chat, instead someone (maybe [SNP national secretary] Angus McLeod) judged it was a heinous crime I had committed and only (what I call) the Delinquency Committee could deal with it.
“The committee is bereft of decency and dignity.”
In a new blog post, Mr Wardell wrote: "To my mind the fault lies with the SNP. And that is a very sad thing to have to say. 
"The principle under attack is this: if every individual named and smeared by our opponents is to be taken out and shot by our own side for the sake of political expediency, who can blame the enemies of democracy from keeping a list of prime targets until each name is crossed out in red, the odious campaign deemed a success.
"The brutal tactics of the British State knows no limit nor decency."
He also accused the SNP's Women's Rights and Equalities Convener of posting "preposterous pyschobabble" on her own blog about the row.
He wrote: "I call upon Fiona Robertson to step down from her post as Women’s Rights and Equalities Convener. She does not have the acumen or the experience to command the post.

"Her attack on my integrity is both scurrilous and lethal. I regard it as defamation and have reported it as such. Her blog undermined cool logic by all sides, inflaming the issue out of all proportions.  She created a false validity where none exists."
He added: "I predicted what the SNP’s decision would be and alas was proved correct. They have precedent for sacrificing loyal supporters.
"Michelle Thomson was crucified and yet had done nothing wrong. Then again, I am in good company, the SNP expelled Alex Salmond back in the days when he was an outspoken and energetic young politician."

Tower Hamlets council rejects plea to amend IHRA anti-semitism definition




Protesters demonstrate outside Tower Hamlets Town Hall. Pic: Thames Menteth

Palestinian solidarity groups staged a demonstration outside Tower Hamlets Town Hall, before disrupting a council meeting, after the Labour majority council refused to amend its definition of antisemitism.
The action marks the latest in the long-running row over antisemitism in the Labour Party.
Along with Labour’s ruling body, Tower Hamlets council voted to adopt the full International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism in September this year. Under the controversial definition, a claim that Israel is a “racist endeavour” is considered antisemitic.
Pro-Palestine groups and their supporters gathered before the meeting on November 21 to voice their concerns over the decision; they believe it will restrict their free speech about Palestine within the borough.
The Tower Hamlets Palestine Solidarity Campaign (THPSC) presented a petition to the council which asked its members to adopt a caveat to the definition to safeguard the group’s rights to legitimately criticise the state of Israel.
Addressing the council on the petition, Sybil Cock, chair of THPSC, said that antisemitism was on the rise across the world but that “this definition does not help to combat it”.
She said: “Palestinians in the West Bank, Gaza and Jerusalem live under brutal military occupation…we want to carry on drawing these stories to the attention of our community.”
Sybil Cock speaks to supporters before the council meeting. Pic: Thames Menteth

Cock also said her group now felt “vulnerable” and wanted to talk about Palestine without fear of being branded antisemitic.
Responding to the petition, Councillor Kevin Brady expressed sympathy for “the pain and suffering of the Palestinian people” but said that “minorities should be allowed to define the discrimination they suffer”.
He asked: “What message does it send to them [Jewish residents of the borough] to say we will not stand by the statement that this council made as a mark of solidarity with the Jewish community?”
Councillor Sirajul Islam also agreed with the sentiments of the petition, but could not see how the IHRA definition prevented residents from criticising the government of Israel.



ohn Biggs, Mayor of Tower hamlets, deemed the petition “offensive” and concluded the meeting by saying: “The petition asks us to amend a decision we took in September but in my view there can be no qualifications or caveats to a definition of racism.”
The meeting was briefly interrupted when a member of the public brandished a ‘FREE PALESTINE’ banner and announced: “Zionism is racism”.
Another man joined in and called on the council to “break with Labour” before the two men were escorted out of the room by security officers.
The THPSC has since disassociated itself from these actions. The group said in a statement afterwards: “We are disappointed that the Mayor chose to reject our petition at full council, and not make a clear commitment to protect freedom of speech. We are also concerned that the Mayor questioned our right to petition, despite his earlier supportive comments. And that the speaker allowed councillors to talk the petitioners out of time, in a further effort to silence us.
The adoption of the definition by Tower Hamlets Council, without caveat or due discussion, threatens division in Tower Hamlets between those who have a common interest in combating antisemitism, Islamophobia, and the rise of the far right.”
130 councils across the UK, the Crown Prosecution Service and the judiciary have adopted the full IHRA definition of anti-semitism, as well as the UK and Scottish governments.








Jews Expelled From Arab Countries Call on UN to Recognize Their Plight




Some 70 years after the exodus and expulsion of as many as 850,000 Jews from Arab states and Iran, the heads of communities of Jews from Arab countries are demanding that the United Nations officially recognize the suffering they were forced to endure.
In a letter to UN Secretary General António Guterres, community leaders, among them Dr. Shimon Ohayon, director of Bar-Ilan University’s Dahan Center and chairman of the Alliance of Moroccan Immigrants wrote, “While the UN organizes events to mark the departure of 450,000 Palestinians from Israel upon the establishment of the state, following a war imposed on Israel, we do not see recognition of the expulsion of Jews from Arab countries.”
They said, “We believe the UN strives for justice for all refugees around the world, including Jewish refugees who were expelled from Arab lands. We therefore seek to establish a memorial day for the Jews’ expulsion from Arab lands.”
Bari-Ilan University was set to host a symposium on Tuesday on the subject to educate members of the younger generation on the subject.
The State of Israel is set to commemorate the expulsion on Nov. 30.

Why Wait for Mashiach?

Today in Jerusalem, I was walking down the street when an Israeli helicopter flew overhead. I still react with a happy shiver whenever I see a Jewish helicopter soar by up in the sky.
“Baruch Hashem,” I said. “Thank you, Hashem, for giving us Jewish helicopters and rescuing us from the lands of the Gentiles.”
I spent over thirty years in New York, and New England, and California, and an assortment of other places in America, and I never saw a Jewish helicopter. Moments later, as if to reward me for my enthusiasm and gratitude, Hashem sent three Israel Air Force jets streaking through the sky over Jerusalem. “Thank you, Hashem,” I said once again, “For giving us Jewish fighter planes and Jewish pilots.”  After all, as I mentioned, I spent over thirty years in America and I never saw a Jewish fighter plane. It just isn’t possible. Why? Because America isn’t Jewish. America belongs to Esav, our arch enemy.
These past few weeks, we have been reading in the Torah a capsule blueprint of world history. First, we met Avraham, the father of the nation chosen by God to bring God’s word to the world through our living a life of holiness in the Land of Israel. Then we met Yishmael, the wild beast of a man, whose descendants, the Arabs have been contesting our right to the Land of Israel, right down to this very day. Then, we met the hairy red ape, Esav, or Esau, as he is called by English translators. From the very womb, he has been contesting our place as the Divine chosen nation, doing everything in his power to usurp us from our God-given role. Esav is Edom. His descendants became the Romans, and the Germans, the Russians, and the Americans. Edom is Christianity and the whole Christian world, including the USA. Take a good look at the architecture of the US government buildings in WDC. Roman columns and frescoes. Edom also means red. That’s why Santa Claus wears red. The jolly old fellow is Edom/Esav in disguise.
So when a Jewish helicopter flies overhead, I get goose pimples, and remember to thank God for all of His kindness and goodness that He has rescued us from the lands of Edom and returned us to our own Promised Land. To me, that’s the greatest miracle there is. The ingathering of the exiles is the greatest revelation of Hashem in the world - just as He promised our forefathers in the Torah, and through Israel’s Prophets, He has returned us to our Land. There is no greater historic evidence of God’s existence than this. The Rambam teaches that the ingathering is a sign that the spirit of Mashiach has already awakened. The State of Israel, with all of its problems and challenges, is the greatest sanctification of God in the world, and the best is yet to come. Why linger in foreign lands? Mashiach is already busy at work. Just open your eyes and see.
Image may contain: one or more people, crowd and outdoor