“It seems to me that Scarlett Jonansson’s position as a global ambassador for Oxfam had become untenable, particularly when she went on record last week to defend SodaStream’s involvement with the Ma’ale Adumim settlement.
Unfortunately, if today’s quote on the BBC is accurate, her spokesperson has made her position even worse by claiming that “She and Oxfam have a fundamental difference of opinion in regards to the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement.”
Oxfam did not ask her to boycott Israel. The SodaSteam plant at the centre of this row is not in Israel. It is in West Bank which is occupied territory. The settlements which Israel continues to build in the West Bank are illegal under international law and they are one of the principal obstacles to peace between Israel and the Palestinians.
Her representative’s statement suggests to me that Ms Johansson either does not recognise, or does not understand, the distinction between operating in Israel and operating in Palestinian lands occupied by Israel.
That is profoundly worrying but her personal views are a matter for her. What is clear is that Scarlett Johansson’s promotional decisions could not be allowed to compromise Oxfam’s values of respect for human rights and international law.”
No comments:
Post a Comment