Cameron To Get Tough on Islamic Extremism – Except That He Won’t by Un:dhimmi

February 5th, 2011 | Author: Un:dhimmi

More waffle from the heads-in-the-sand European political élite:
David Cameron will today signal a tougher Government stance towards groups which promote Islamist extremism.
David Cameron says it’s time to pay more respect to Western value.
The Prime Minister will say that the doctrine of multi-culturalism has failed during a speech in which he calls for “muscular liberalism” in defence of Western values.
He will also blame the radicalisation of Muslim youths and the phenomenon of home-grown terrorism on a “hands-off tolerance” from the authorities. Ministers should refuse to share platforms or engage with groups that peddle separatist ideology, he will say.
Such groups should also be denied access to public money and barred from spreading their message in universities and prisons, he will argue.
This is wrong. Someone can be a devout Muslim and not be an extremist. We need to be clear: Islamist extremism and Islam are not the same thing.
Mr Cameron will make his comments during a speech in the German city of Munich.
“Frankly, we need a lot less of the passive tolerance of recent years and much more active, muscular liberalism,” the Prime Minister will say.
Mr Cameron’s speech comes on the day of a planned march in Luton by the far-right English Defence League. But aides rejected suggestions that his comments might fuel racial or religious tensions.

Clueless or duplicitous? David Cameron claims he will get tough on Islamic extremism. But what is his track record on grand promises to the electorate on 'hot' issues such as this?

The Prime Minister will stress that right-wing extremists and Christian fundamentalist preachers of hate must also be condemned, they said. He will also insist that a clear distinction must be made between the religion of Islam and the political ideology of Islamist extremism.
It is wrong to link strong religious faith with radicalism “as if all devout Muslims must be extremist”, Mr Cameron will say.
“This is wrong. Someone can be a devout Muslim and not be an extremist. We need to be clear: Islamist extremism and Islam are not the same thing.”
But he will say that it is no longer enough for the authorities simply to proscribe groups which advocate violence or ban foreign preachers of hate from coming to the UK.
“Non-violent extremists” who disparage democracy, oppose universal human rights and promote separatism are also “part of the problem”, he will say.
A casual listener pondering Cameron’s speech would probably tend to feel somewhat reassured. ‘At last, a mainstream politician who sounds like he wants to do something about Muslim extremism’, they might think.
And they’d be dead wrong.
David Cameron is a liar. He made major Eurosceptic noises before coming to power – only to gradually dilute them later. He promised a referendum (with a ‘cast-iron’ guarantee’) on the Lisbon treaty, arrogantly signed on behalf of the British by his much-despised predecessor Gordon Brown; who didn’t believe the British people were fit to vote on the European Constitution they had never asked for in the first place.
Cameron backpedalled.
He promised non-EU immigration (we now have no control whatsoever over intra-EU migration), would be reduced from the ‘hundreds of thousands’ per year of the Blair years, to ‘the tens of thousands’.
He once again retreated from his position.
In the light of political reality – and due to pressure from cheap labour-addicted big business (his paymasters) he was forced to climb down from appealing-sounding election promises again; this time touting an exemption from the so-called Intra-Company Transfer scheme (even its name is a lie) – itself the source of much of the abuse.
He also omits to mention that even his already caveat-loaded immigration promises do not include dependents – in practice, a massive immigration multiplier and a further source of much abuse.
On Islam too, he is a paper tiger:

“..it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian [Muslim] way of life, not the other way around.” –David Cameron, 2007

In today’s forthcoming ‘leaked’ speech, the fundamental flaws of Cameron’s stance are clear. He make an almost laughable (if it weren’t so deliberate) false equivalence between the hatred and intolerance endemic to Islam and some supposed ‘Christian extremism’ living in our midst.
But just where are these Christian extremists? And how does their terror tally compare with that of the almost 17,000 deadly attacks by Muslims on non-Muslims, since 9/11 alone?
He avers that “Islamist extremism and Islam are not the same thing.”
Well, we hate to disappoint you, Mr. Cameron – but they are. The Prime Minister of Turkey put it just about as well as anyone we’ve heard:

“There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that’s it.” Recep Tayyip Erdoǧan

The font, the root causes, of all Islamic extremist acts have been none other than the teachings of the Qur’an, the ahadith and the Prophet Mohammed himself – a violent supremacist and pederast, who spread his ‘faith’ by military conquest, slaughter, and repression.
And while it’s certainly true that many individual Muslims are peaceful – the same cannot be said of Islam itself.
It exists solely to gain supremacy and to subjugate non-believers wherever it finds itself – and, with politicians like Cameron and his woeful predecessors in charge, nowhere is it doing so more successfully than Britain.
If you believe, like us, that you should judge someone on their actions and not merely their words – you won’t believe a word of what Cameron says today.
[Source: Sky News]
http://undhimmi.com/2011/02/05/cameron-to-get-tough-on-islamic-extremism-except-that-he-wont/